Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2016

Hip resurfacing is an alternative technology to total hip replacement that is aimed at treating painful conditions of the hip in younger active patients.

Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2016.

The birmingham hip resurfacing is the answer to younger patients with severe hip pain due to arthritis. This article talks about some of the major differences between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. Unlike traditional hip replacement surgery resurfacing does not remove as much of your leg bone. Results from long term data show that it can last just as long or longer than traditional hip replacement in young high demand patients especially men.

Hip resurfacing is a less invasive approach to hip replacement and involves removing only the affected portions of the hip joint. Hip resurfacing a procedure that improves the function of your own hip joint may be a viable alternative to total hip replacement surgery. These patients are too young for a total hip replacement because of the severe limitations after the surgery. Since its fda approval in 2006 more than 3 000 hip.

Importantly hip resurfacing needn t be looked at as a temporary procedure inevitably leading to hip replacement down the road. Hip replacement alleviates pain by removing the affected bones and cartilage and replacing it with a prosthetic implant that imitates the function of the joint. Hip resurfacing is a less invasive form of joint replacement surgery which is advised to only selected individuals.